Pro Net Competition: Other Voices


Page 2 of 7 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »

The Googly Eyed Monster

February 14, 2008 - link >>

Peter Suderman, The American Spectator

When Microsoft recently announced its proposal to acquire Internet search giant Yahoo! for $44 billion, two things were immediately certain. First, consumers would be likely to see enormous potential benefits from a merger between the two companies. Second, bureaucrats, rivals, and Microsoft-haters of all shapes and sizes—but especially those that rhyme with frugal—would do anything they could to slow or stop the deal.

Where there are clouds and lightning one can eventually expect to hear thunder. And behold, Google came booming through the stratosphere, or at least the blogosphere, with carefully-worded but dire warnings. The Chief Legal Officer for the leading search engine weighed in with a lawyerly series of leading questions:



Agency Urges Caution on Net Neutrality

February 10, 2008 - link >>

Associated Press, ABC News

The chairman of the Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday recommended against additional regulation of high-speed Internet traffic.

Deborah Platt Majoras said policymakers should proceed cautiously on the issue of “net neutrality,” which is the notion that all online traffic should be treated equally by Internet service providers.

In a statement issued Wednesday, Majoras said that without evidence of “market failure or demonstrated consumer harm, policy makers should be particularly hesitant to enact new regulation in this area.”

In separate remarks before a lawyers’ group Wednesday, Majoras said the agency was unaware of any market failure or consumer harm in the high-speed Internet market, according to a written copy of her speech.

Majoras’ comments provide support for telecommunications companies such as AT&T Inc. and Comcast Corp., which oppose so-called net neutrality regulation. They would like the option of charging customers more for transmitting certain content, such as live video, faster or more reliably than other data.



10 Things You Need To Know About Regulation

January 24, 2008 - link >>

Mark Walsh, Media Post Productions

Our lawmakers can barely keep up with the ever-evolving landscape of the Web. Here’s what you need to know right now about regulation:

1. Efforts to legislate Net neutrality appeared all but dead this year. But the issue has gained new life from recent developments, including the revelation that Comcast has been actively filtering --and even blocking --its customers’ Internet connections when they are found to be using file-sharing service BitTorrent. 



Perspective: Save Internet freedom--from regulation

December 12, 2007 - link >>

Larry Downes, CNet

Rep. Edward Markey is preparing to reintroduce legislation that would prohibit Internet access providers from offering priority service to content providers--known as the Net neutrality principle.

Similar legislation has failed in both the House and Senate in the past, but proponents of Net neutrality haven’t given up.

If only they would.

The Internet has thrived in large part because it has managed to sidestep a barrage of efforts to regulate it, including laws to ban indecent material, levy sales tax on e-commerce, require Web sites to provide “zoning” tags, and to criminalize spam, file sharing, and spyware. 



Swartzenneggar Speaks Against Net Neutrality

December 03, 2007 - link >>

Trading Markets

California governor Arnold Swarzennegger has apparently come out against so called net neutrality legislation supported by Google and Amazon.

At a made for media forum in Los Angeles Swartzennegger promoted upgrading broadband and digital Internet pipelines by endorsing both private and public partnerships. Companies such as Google have opposed measures that might cause higher speed Internet connections to be paid for by consumers and have supported legislation that would disallow different prices to be charged for web access.

Swartzenegger said that California needs to spend about $500 million over 10 years to meet the broadband needs of the state’s growing population. 




Page 2 of 7 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »




Google Computer IV


Senate Republican Letter


House Democrat Letter


The Harms of a Potential New FCC De-Competition Policy


Universal Search Submission to the FCC


Letter to the FCC from the Broadband Industry regarding Title II Re-Classification


Critical Gaps in the FCC's Open Internet Regulations


Open Season on the Internet


How the FCC is Changing the Internet


The Many Vulnerabilities of an Open Internet


Why HR 3458 is the Most Extreme Version of Net Neutrality Yet


House Energy & Commerce Committee Behavioral Advertising Testimony


Comments on National Broadband Plan -- Notice of Inquiry (NOI)


NetCompetition.org Files Comments on National Broadband Plan NOI


Why the Australian "Fiber Mae" Broadband Model Does Not Work for the U.S.


Building Upon a Strong Broadband Foundation


Check out Scott Cleland's Debate Audio File from the
9/9/08 ITIF Forum


Press Release on New Broadband White Paper
Adobe PDF


Don't be Fooled by the National Broadband Policy "Straw Man"
Adobe PDF

 

Search

Email List Signup


Join e-Forum >>
© 2009
NETCompetition.org
Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

NETCompetition.org is a wholly owned subsidiary of Precursor, LLC.