Pro Net Competition: Other Voices


Page 7 of 7 pages « First  <  5 6 7

CAGW Tells Congress to Keep Their Hands off the Internet

April 24, 2007 - link >>

Citizens Against Government Waste

Washington, D.C. - Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) today urged Congress to say no to a national broadband policy and government intrusion of the Internet.  After the release of a world-wide broadband usage report, Senate and House Committees held hearings today to examine the need for further government involvement in broadband service in light of other countries’ policies.

“The Internet has thrived in America precisely because it has been free from government interference.  The implementation of burdensome regulations, wasteful subsidies, and complicated tax breaks that other countries are imposing will only stifle growth and innovation,” said CAGW President Tom Schatz.  “Competition and the free market must be allowed to continue to work.”



Cohen: Profits Behind Net-Neutrality Fight

April 12, 2007 - link >>

Ted Hearn, Multichannel News

Comcast Executive Vice President: Advocates of Regulation Are Committing the Most Discrimination



Economists’ Statement on Network Neutrality Policy

March 30, 2007 - link >>

JOINT CENTER - AEI-BROOKINGS JOINT CENTER FOR REGULATORY STUDIES

Authors: William J. Baumol, Martin Cave, Peter Cramton, Robert Hahn, Thomas W. Hazlett, Paul L. Joskow, Alfred E. Kahn, Robert Litan, John Mayo, Patrick A. Messerlin, Bruce M. Owen, Robert S. Pindyck, Scott J. Savage, Vernon L. Smith, Scott Wallsten, Leonard Waverman and Lawrence J. White

Network neutrality is a policy proposal that would regulate how network providers manage and price the use of their networks. Congress has introduced several bills on network neutrality. Proposed legislation generally would mandate that Internet service providers exercise no control over the content that flows over their lines and would bar providers from charging more for preferentially faster access to the Internet. These proposals must be considered carefully in light of the underlying economics. Our basic concern is that most proposals aimed at implementing net neutrality are likely to do more harm than good.



Good News, Bad News: Telecom Reform in the House

April 03, 2006 - link >>

James Gattuso, Heritage Foundation, WebMemo #1026



Hanging Up on Regulation: The Case for Telecommunications Reform

March 27, 2006 - link >>

The Honorable John Ensign, Heritage Foundation Lecture #932




Page 7 of 7 pages « First  <  5 6 7




Google Computer IV


Senate Republican Letter


House Democrat Letter


The Harms of a Potential New FCC De-Competition Policy


Universal Search Submission to the FCC


Letter to the FCC from the Broadband Industry regarding Title II Re-Classification


Critical Gaps in the FCC's Open Internet Regulations


Open Season on the Internet


How the FCC is Changing the Internet


The Many Vulnerabilities of an Open Internet


Why HR 3458 is the Most Extreme Version of Net Neutrality Yet


House Energy & Commerce Committee Behavioral Advertising Testimony


Comments on National Broadband Plan -- Notice of Inquiry (NOI)


NetCompetition.org Files Comments on National Broadband Plan NOI


Why the Australian "Fiber Mae" Broadband Model Does Not Work for the U.S.


Building Upon a Strong Broadband Foundation


Check out Scott Cleland's Debate Audio File from the
9/9/08 ITIF Forum


Press Release on New Broadband White Paper
Adobe PDF


Don't be Fooled by the National Broadband Policy "Straw Man"
Adobe PDF

 

Search

Email List Signup


Join e-Forum >>
© 2009
NETCompetition.org
Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

NETCompetition.org is a wholly owned subsidiary of Precursor, LLC.