Pro Net Competition: Op-Eds and Editorials


Page 3 of 9 pages « First  <  1 2 3 4 5 >  Last »

“Net neutrality” is stupid

December 16, 2008 - link >>

Robin Harris, ZDNet

Today’s net neutrality tempest - Google: are they or aren’t they? - is a marketing mistake with grave public policy implications. The mistake was law professor Tim Wu’s: creating a new label when a perfectly good one is already there.



Why Has Google Demanded a “Fast Lane”?

December 15, 2008 - link >>

John C. Dvorak, PCMag.com

Google is asking for trouble. The search giant has suddenly begun to talk about the need for a fast lane for its offerings—opening a hornet’s nest of debate regarding its motives. After all, Google has servers all over the planet sitting on world-class fiber, and we all know it’s one of the most responsive sites online. So what’s this baloney all about, really? 



Winds Are Shifting on Net Neutrality

December 15, 2008 - link >>

Xchange

Net neutrality always has evoked strong feelings, but feelings can sometimes change. And that’s exactly what seems to be happening. That’s good news in more than one way for the telcos and cablecos that own and operate the nation’s broadband infrastructure. 



Gag Me with a Law

October 27, 2008 - link >>

Christy Hall Robinson, AEI

In a period of unprecedented access to information, the First Amendment rights of freedom of the press and freedom of speech are in danger, warns A Manifesto for Media Freedom. The rapid development of media types and venues has prompted both new and revived attempts to control them, and in growing numbers policymakers, nonprofits, and pundits are advocating regulation of radio, television, the Internet, and other media.

Brian C. Anderson, editor of City Journal, and Adam D. Thierer, senior fellow at the Progress and Freedom Foundation, offer a brief and timely defense of the First Amendment. Explaining what different regulatory proposals mean for free speech and freedom of the press, they demand that lawmakers and government officials not interfere with the constitutional rights of American citizens.



Keep the Internet Free

October 23, 2008 - link >>

ANDREA RENDA, The Wall Street Journal

As the knowledge-based economy advances, the same infrastructure—the Internet—will be used to make phone calls, watch television, play video games, even access eHealth and eGovernment services. In this environment, it takes many to tango. Competing Internet Service Providers, or ISPs, must ensure both that application and content providers join their platforms, and that users are offered the best possible set of services at the most competitive price.




Page 3 of 9 pages « First  <  1 2 3 4 5 >  Last »




Google Computer IV


Senate Republican Letter


House Democrat Letter


The Harms of a Potential New FCC De-Competition Policy


Universal Search Submission to the FCC


Letter to the FCC from the Broadband Industry regarding Title II Re-Classification


Critical Gaps in the FCC's Open Internet Regulations


Open Season on the Internet


How the FCC is Changing the Internet


The Many Vulnerabilities of an Open Internet


Why HR 3458 is the Most Extreme Version of Net Neutrality Yet


House Energy & Commerce Committee Behavioral Advertising Testimony


Comments on National Broadband Plan -- Notice of Inquiry (NOI)


NetCompetition.org Files Comments on National Broadband Plan NOI


Why the Australian "Fiber Mae" Broadband Model Does Not Work for the U.S.


Building Upon a Strong Broadband Foundation


Check out Scott Cleland's Debate Audio File from the
9/9/08 ITIF Forum


Press Release on New Broadband White Paper
Adobe PDF


Don't be Fooled by the National Broadband Policy "Straw Man"
Adobe PDF

 

Search

Email List Signup


Join e-Forum >>
© 2009
NETCompetition.org
Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

NETCompetition.org is a wholly owned subsidiary of Precursor, LLC.