Apr 30, 2009

DPI: It’s Going to Be About More Than Ads Stacey Higginbotham, Gigaom tell a friend >>
article link >>

The practice of deep packet inspection has raised privacy concerns among several organizations, including The Free Press and Center for Democracy and Technology. Congress recently heard testimony about ISPs using the technology to target advertising at web surfers. But DPI vendors reveal that advertising is a blunt instrument when it comes to generating revenue. It’s likely most carriers will use DPI, which can determine the details of packets traveling over the web, to boost sales in far more subtle ways.

Kurt Dobbins, chief technology officer of IP services with Arbor Networks, which purchased DPI vendor Ellacoya in January 2008, talked to me last year about the likelihood of using DPI to provide a form of consumption-based broadband. Instead of a flat-out metering program, such packages might offer subscribers an emphasis on voice or gaming services and prioritize packets accordingly. Kevin Walsh, vice president of marketing at Zeugma Systems, has a similar vision. Zeugma, which provides equipment to telecoms, doesn’t do DPI but can track some information on packets in order to prioritize certain content.

Operators could let consumers subscribe to a broad video package that would include prioritization for a service such as online video. Walsh was quick to point out that such an offering wouldn’t degrade normal Internet traffic, but it’s still an effort that could raise a few eyebrows. Aside from using DPI as a way to offer different broadband packages, Dobbins says it can and will be used as a way to foster security. He stressed that by monitoring network traffic for spam or for computers that are being used in attacks, DPI can alert ISPs and even help them alert affected customers. This is less about spam filtering on a machine for an individual consumer, and more about offering clean pipes, Dobbins said.

However, security does come at the expense of privacy, which is the underlying issue that led to the hearings in Congress in the first place. And so far, DPI has been used by companies such as NebuAd to track surfing habits in order to serve up ads, and Comcast in order to block P2P packets. The technology isn’t evil, but its implementations have been questionable.

article link >>

Tell a Friend...









Google Computer IV


Senate Republican Letter


House Democrat Letter


The Harms of a Potential New FCC De-Competition Policy


Universal Search Submission to the FCC


Letter to the FCC from the Broadband Industry regarding Title II Re-Classification


Critical Gaps in the FCC's Open Internet Regulations


Open Season on the Internet


How the FCC is Changing the Internet


The Many Vulnerabilities of an Open Internet


Why HR 3458 is the Most Extreme Version of Net Neutrality Yet


House Energy & Commerce Committee Behavioral Advertising Testimony


Comments on National Broadband Plan -- Notice of Inquiry (NOI)


NetCompetition.org Files Comments on National Broadband Plan NOI


Why the Australian "Fiber Mae" Broadband Model Does Not Work for the U.S.


Building Upon a Strong Broadband Foundation


Check out Scott Cleland's Debate Audio File from the
9/9/08 ITIF Forum


Press Release on New Broadband White Paper
Adobe PDF


Don't be Fooled by the National Broadband Policy "Straw Man"
Adobe PDF

 

Search

Email List Signup


Join e-Forum >>
© 2009
NETCompetition.org
Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

NETCompetition.org is a wholly owned subsidiary of Precursor, LLC.